dannyman.toldme.com


Excerpts, Testimonials

Starbucks: Not Evil

I am not a big fan of Starbucks. It’s not merely that I’m anti-trendy, but it just isn’t my idea of a nice coffee shop. (My idea of coffee doesn’t encompass “twenty ounces served in a paper cup with a plastic lid,” unless I’m stopping at a gas station on the Interstate.) But they give benefits to part-time employees, and as far as I have ever heard, the company conducts itself in a decent manner uncharacteristic of many greedy megacorporations. The latest evidence comes from AP / Yahoo:

Starbucks Coffee
A Starbucks in Washington, DC.
(Thanks, EXB-WDC)

ASTORIA, Ore. – A judge has told Sam Buck that she can’t call her coffee shop Sambuck’s. The judge ruled the name violated the trademark of coffee giant Starbucks.

But there is a silver lining for the small business owner. Buck won’t have to pay Starbucks’ legal fees, [although Starbucks is entitled to claim legal fees.]

“It’s not about David and Goliath,” said May Kulthol, manager of media relations for Starbucks Coffee. “We try to deal with these types of situations amicably and to come to a good conclusion for both parties. The defendant is not required to pay legal fees nor did we seek damages from her.”

I had earlier read about this case, that Starbucks offered $500 up front to compensate the small business for the hassle of changing their name. Starbucks? Not evil. Maybe they can partner with Google or something. Or at least set an example for the Walmarts and the Sonys.

Read More

Next:
Previous:
Categories: Excerpts, Testimonials
Possibly-Related Posts

Response

December 9th, 2005

arata

I disagree with the decision. Given no further information than what you posted, and assuming that the person’s name was actually Sam Buck – they had every right to open a restaurant bearing their own name, assuming they made an effort to make the look of their establishment different from the original starbucks. Legal fees being compensated or not, it doesnt matter. This is an obvious case of trademark abuse – similar to the mikerowesoft.com dispute.

Comment

Leave a comment . . .

Tiny Print:

  1. For private messages, e-mail me: dannyman@toldme.com.
  2. You must provide an e-mail address.
  3. You can use a bogus e-mail address, but I like to know who you are.
  4. I will not spam you. I will not publish or share your e-mail address.
  5. First-time commenters will be held for review.
  6. You can use these HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>